OP-ED

06.04.2020

Council of the Syrian Charter

There comes a pivotal moment in every conflict when members of society need to step up to the plate and resolve their differences, however, they may have arisen, on their own terms    

The signatories and supporters of the Code of Conduct for Syrian Coexistence (CoC), have done just that. Public figures and community leaders from all walks of Syrian life have been working together for several years towards a common goal. That is, to help their compatriots overcome the discord between them and achieve a new, enduring social contract for all Syrians, and for all elements of Syrian society.

Spurred on by the devastation caused by the fragmentation of Syrian society, these signatories and supporters from both inside Syria and the Syrian diaspora have gathered together in dialogue over the potential future of their homeland. Their discussions have resulted in the formation of an institutional body known as the Council of the Syrian Charter. The founding document of which was signed by members in November before the establishment of the Council of the Syrian Charter was formally announced in March 2019. 

The Council of the Syrian Charter is unique because it is a strictly non-partisan and non-governmental network which includes members from various political backgrounds in Syria who often hold opposing views. They are, however, united in their desire to bring together the Syrian people, to end the bloodshed, and to build a vision for future generations, based on the diversity and equality of the people.  The work of the council depends on the often-dangerous participation of a wide network of active members and supporter. It is, therefore, left to the discretion of individual participants whether they wish their names to be published.  

The Council of the Syrian Charter is committed to giving Syrians a platform to voice their concerns and to introduce their idea to relevant policy circles. The Council considers itself an interface between various societal groups, governmental bodies, and international institutions. The council is therefore well-placed to facilitate mediation and confidence-building  efforts between different elements of Syrian society. To this end, members of the council are in constant contact with various representatives of national and international parties. During these conversations the Council of the Syrian Charter strives to speak for many Syrians who often go underrepresented and unheard.   

The Council of the Syrian Charter strongly encourages all Syrians, wherever they may currently reside, to sign, to support, and to implement the Code of Conduct for Syrian Coexistence. They can also follow the council’s Facebook page to join its members in the conversation about Syria’s social, economic and political future and to rediscover what unites them.  

About us

Souria 11 derives its name from the eleven clauses found in the “Code of Conduct for Syrian coexistence”. The Code of Conduct comprises ideas from Syrians themselves to be presented to their fellow Syrians. It includes what Syrians believe to be necessary to revive Syria as a state which is inclusive of all citizens regardless of their religious, ethnic, regional and linguistic backgrounds – as a single homeland where Syrians can discuss and debate forms of governance as they see fit in a mutually beneficial manner.  

This website is an attempt to establish an open channel between the Syrian public and those Syrians who were involved in the drafting of the “Code of Conduct for Syrian coexistence” and those who are members of the “Council of the Syrian Charter”. It is hoped that the website will become a place to share ideas and discuss concepts for people – where those who have had similar experience of tragedy can help one another to overcome their pasts and to work together to encourage live to return to their homes in the spirit of solidarity, civil peace, and community cohesion.

We hope that the “Code of Conduct for Syrian coexistence” will be the first step along the path to make Syria a home for all of its citizens.

Other

29.07.2022

The Code of Conduct for Syrian Coexistence: Prospects and challenges 2

The Council of the Syrian Charter has drawn inspiration from the various experiences of
countries that went through similar situations to Syria, without losing sight of the specifics of
the war in Syria, complete with its complexity and uniqueness.
In the following, I will endeavor to expand upon the last six principles of the Code of Conduct
for Syrian Coexistence:


Sixth Principle: Repair The Damage, Restitute and Compensate


Several conflict-torn nations have historically adopted this principle, paving the way for
building a future and as a cornerstone in the implementation of transitional justice. It is a
means of healing wounds, relieving tension, reducing feelings of hatred and revenge, and
consolidating the concepts of tolerance, reconciliation and mutual societal trust. This principle
deals mainly with the future of Syria, such that a sustainable civil peace is ensured.
It is important, however, to note that Syria has witnessed atrocities and destruction so horrific
that no one, in my opinion, can imagine its extent or have a real perception of the losses
inflicted on Syrians. It is rare, if not impossible, to find a Syrian who has not been affected by
this war in one way or another. The losses and the amount of destruction is greater than any
estimation.
Undeniably, this principle tackles a heavy and exhausting matter, yet one which is necessary
when it comes to addressing as complex a crisis as the Syrian conflict. This clause essentially
states that each person affected by the conflict in Syria is entitled to compensation
commensurate with the nature and extent of the damage suffered by them. Appropriate and
accurate mechanisms, based on recognized international legal bases, should be used to
implement this principle.
Syrians affected before the start of the conflict in 2011 are certainly not forgotten and are to
be compensated for the violations of their rights and confiscation of their properties and so on.
It goes without saying that implementing this principle requires enormous resources and it is
therefore that Syrian, regional and international efforts must be combined to reach this goal.
By implementing this principle in spite of all the difficulties it presents, it is possible to
overcome and address several catastrophic consequences of the war, and to provide serious
guarantees that such events will not be repeated in the future.


Seventh Principle: Human Suffering, Detainees, Prisoners and Missing Persons


This principle deals with another element of the atrocities and effects of the war and its
repercussions that might extend to the next generations. It complements the previous principle
in its overarching goal to achieve transitional justice. This clause deals with the crimes
committed against Syrians, some of which amount to war crimes and crimes against
humanity. Needless to say, international organizations’ reports show horrific numbers of
Syrian victims, from martyrs, to the wounded and disabled, those detained to those kidnapped
and still missing. Countless people need to be compensated, treated and cared for in a difficult
process that will take years or even decades. This principle therefore aims to reinstate a
dignified life for Syrians who have been subject to the most heinous violations. As such, all
necessary means and resources should be made available to implement it. The process of
implementing this will certainly be the responsibility of the future SyriainSyrian state and its
society. Notably, the Code of Conduct is also careful to note that this should also apply to the
cases that occurred before the start of the conflict in March 2011. This is particularly
important in how it contributes to treating the ancient roots of the conflict.


Eighth principle: The Diversity of Syrian Society


“Syria is a place that should be examined in order to see the coexistence of different religious
and ethnic societies, and to observe how it is dealt with immigration from and to Syria”, wrote
the German researcher Katja Brinkmann. This striking observation represents an important
perspective that we ought to bear in mind when seeking to understand Syria and address its
current national crisis and future problems.
It is without a doubt that, in order to tackle Syria’s conflict, there needs to be a clear
recognition of Syria’s constitutionally and legal pluralism. Following this, there needs to be a
new civil, social and constitutional contract guaranteeing equal participation for all Syrians in
the political life of the ‘new’ state, one in which a move away from exclusion or
marginalization of any group is avoided.
One of Syria’s issues – which, in part, led to the current national crisis – lies in the
discrepancy between the decades-long formal recognition of Syria’s pluralism by the authority
and the dominant political force and the failure to translate this recognition into political,
cultural, economic and social practice. In fact, there was even the imposition of an ideological
identity on an ethnic basis, without at all taking into account the pluralism of Syrian society.
As such, Syria had a seemingly cohesive society; one with an imposed identity, an artificial
unity, and one which was in a state of denial about the existence of any internal structural
problems, such as sectarian or the ethnic problems facing various groups, like the Kurds.
These concealed problems came to the surface during the conflict in the form of deep societal
fractures. It is important that we therefore have the courage to acknowledge and treat them.
With the inclusion of this principle, the Code of Conduct clearly states that Syria is a
pluralistic and diverse society. To this end, all the elements necessary to build a
comprehensive Syrian national identity exist and can be combined in a new national project –
one which aims to establish a new state and a unified and homogeneous society based on
pluralism and diversity. This is exactly what future Syria needs.


Ninth principle: Depoliticize The Origins


This principle is particularly pertinent for the uniqueness of the Syrian case, given its society’s
makeup of different ethnic, religious, sectarian and tribal groups. As enshrined in international
human rights law, a person has the right to belong to a certain group in society, and to practice
their religion and rituals. While a person could choose to change their religion, it is not
possible to change their ethnicity. Some affiliations cannot be changed; they are born with
them and will die with them. The issue of affiliations is so complex and can be examined from
multiple angles to make it clearer:
Firstly, there is no group that is totally homogeneous. Every and each component is internally
diverse, with various ideological and political trends and differences. No one individual has
the right to speak on their behalf or to claim their representation .
Secondly, the comprehensive Syrian identity includes and represents all components of
society, yet no ethnic or religious affiliation alone can represent the Syrian pluralism.
Thirdly, various political and identity affiliations have been politicized and, as a result, pre-made
identities have been imposed onto Syrians. Their right to the freedom to form their
national self-awareness was taken away, which led to a failure to establish a homogeneous
and unified structure at the heart of its diversity. We have therefore reached this critical point
where diversity and pluralism now threaten the Syrian identity, as opposed to function as a
destabilizing point.
Herein lies the importance of this principle which states that Syria cannot be painted with any
single ethnic or religious character, rather that its pluralism and diversity must be respected.
At the heart of this principle is the idea that a comprehensive national identity must be
developed which guarantees the rights of all parts of society and ensures the unity of the
nation and its future. As for ethnic, religious, or tribal affiliation, when they are politically
capitalized on, they inevitably become a fatal identity. We therefore understand the
importance and necessity of preventing the establishment of political parties or affiliations
based on ethnic, religious, sectarian, tribal or regional fault lines.


Tenth principle: The Common Cultural Heritage


Throughout history, Syria has been both blessed and cursed with a combination of a strategic
geographical location and a culture of acceptance. It has therefore attracted multiple groups of
people, including invaders, settlers, and those who escaping tyranny or danger. All of these
groups brought their culture and heritage to Syria and enriched the country with an
astounding diversity. Syria is a land of successive civilizations and more than seven thousand
years of cultural heritage and long history. Thirty-eight civilizations – documented thus far –
came together to culminate in this special and unique culture, which in turn became a
common cultural heritage for all Syrians. With such a unique and varied cultural mixture
comes the responsibility to respect, preserve and protect this heritage, since it is truly at the
heart of the comprehensive Syrian national identity.
The cumulative pluralistic Syrian cultural heritage has been exposed to enormous dangers. It
has suffered from systematic and targeted destruction during the war as a means of striking
the solid foundation upon which the national identity of Syrian society is built. Not to mention
the organized lootings of antiquities by various individuals, gangs and countries. Reports by
international organizations are chilling in this regard, noting that more than ten thousand
archaeological sites have been stolen in northern Syria. The confiscation of Syrian antiquities,
smuggled and stolen, has become daily headlines in the country.
The Syrian common cultural heritage, on the basis of which a new Syria can be built, is in
serious danger. The Code of Conduct emphasizes in its tenth principle that preserving it is a
humanitarian, moral and national responsibility for all Syrians.


Eleventh principle: Equality Of Syrians, Protection Of Their Freedom


The eleventh principles of the Code of Conduct shape the aspirational future Syria as a state
of citizenship, built on a new social contract. The aspirational Syria is a modern state that
follows a civilizational path and respects human values, science and scholars.
It is a democratic state, where elections are fair, free and transparent and the separation of
powers is non-negotiable. This future Syria has respected systems, laws and the constitution,
and all citizens are equal before the law. It is a state that respects its citizens, protects their
rights and dignity, allowing them to enjoy the freedoms stipulated in international law and
regulations, especially political, civil and personal rights, without facing any discrimination
on the basis of gender, race or religion.

OP-ED

28.07.2021

The code of Conduct for Syrian Coexistence: Prospects and challenges

The Code of Conduct summarizes a great deal of work, several years of efforts and dozens of dialogue meetings in several European cities between Syrian societal figures from all components of Syrian society. They share common denominators, the most important of which is that they are not involved in the armed conflict, they are liberated from the dualism of the “regime and the opposition” and are aware of the serious risks posed by the continuation of the conflict in and over Syria.

 

They met, they discussed, they disagreed, they negotiated – and all this without interference or pressure, as the role of the host countries was limited to securing a safe and neutral environment for dialogue, something highly valued and appreciated.

 

In the end, they agreed and issued a document, under the title: The Code of Conduct for Syrian Coexistence (CoC).

 

The document consists of a brief introduction and eleven articles, drafted in clear and professional legal language, and it represents what can be considered common denominators for the majority of Syrians, while also establishing a genuine conciliatory atmosphere. The very brief and rich introduction confirms that the Code of Conduct is a convergence document from which Syrians can start their new national project, liberated from the dilemmas of the past and the present that constrain them.

 

It can be said that the eleven articles of the document are what Syrians agree on; they constitute a balanced and acceptable consensus situation, and it is difficult for anyone to reject them explicitly, unless he or she belongs to extremist parties or ideas – and I do not believe that the Code of Conduct is primarily directed to these people.

 

The articles of the code; from article 1 “The Recognition of the Territorial Integrity of Syria”, to article 3, “No Victor, no Vanquished”, to article 4 “No Side is Innocent” (holding all conflict parties responsible for what happened), article 5 “Accountability, not Revenge”, and article 6 “Repair the Damage, Restitute and Compensate”, to the 7th article on the humanitarian file: all help to spread a conciliatory atmosphere, consolidate the culture of peace, and enhance the values ​​of citizenship. The other articles acknowledge the diverse identity of the Syrian society (article 8) and “The Common Cultural Heritage” (article 10), while article 9 “Depoliticize the Origins”, are all principles that confirm the Syrian unity ensured by its diversity and richness.

 

But most importantly, in my view, or the remarkable foresight, is betting on the inevitability of breaking the destructive dichotomy that has ruled Syria for the past ten years, the dichotomy of the regime and the opposition. Indeed, the Code of Conduct – if it reaches everyone and is spread in Syria – would contribute to the crystallization of a national popular current free of that duality/dichotomy that includes the majority of Syrians. The Code of Conduct can change the course of events and impose a solution that is in line with the interests of the Syrian people.

 

The Code of Conduct and the lengthy dialogues on and about it represent important progress. It is the first purely Syrian societal dialogue in which other countries have no participation or a decisive role. It is a dialogue between Syrian figures from all components of society – from inside and outside Syria. Another important message that the Code sent to all parties and to the international community is that Syrians, even if they live in an almost complete absence of a culture of dialogue, are still able to engage in dialogue and succeed in reaching goals and principles that unite them, if the appropriate atmosphere and conditions are provided for them. Thus, it has aborted all the attempts of despair and frustration promoted by internal and external parties who believe that it is impossible for Syrians to reach an agreement or have a successful dialogue between them.

 

The Code and its Council aim to end the violent and armed conflict on the ground and aspire to engage in a civilized state of disagreement over ideas and visions: therefore the CoC is considered an existential threat to those who do not wish to end the war.

There is no doubt that the Code, since its announcement, has been subjected to multiple challenges and problems, and the first challenge was the immediate attacks it was exposed to from the conflict parties, and this, in my estimation, is natural and expected. Some media outlets played a role in these attacks when they published the document under sectarian headings.

 

The other challenge is a big and important question, which the Code and its participants found themselves in front of, namely: What’s next? Do we consider that we have accomplished our mission and presented Syrians a document and principles that can form a foundation upon which to build? Or do we consider the issuance of the Code as a basis for us to build on, to move on to the next step? There is no doubt that the positive echoes of the CoC, the interaction and the wide interest that it received both in local and foreign circles, the feeling of the necessity to complete the project and take it to another advanced step, to  not let it turn into a missed opportunity, made it clear for the Council and those in charge to move to the stage of institutionalizing the work. Despite the difficult and complex conditions imposed by the Corona pandemic restrictions, the Council continues to work to spread the CoC principles.

 

However, the most prominent challenge facing the Code is the failure to achieve any significant progress in the political process. It is true that the Code, with its positive effects on Syrian society, may help ripen the conditions for a political solution, but its real role will be evident during and after the implementation of the solution. Especially by contributing towards reaching a social and political organization for the future Syrian state and rooting for a new Syrian social contract based on citizenship, as stated in its introduction.

 

However, despite this, several meetings have been held and a number of declarations were issued by the Council of the Syrian Charter that accompanied important events and transformations in Syria and in the region, and the Code was widely disseminated.

 

There is no doubt that the Code has imposed its presence well, through the continuous efforts of its Council to introduce and activate its principles on the ground. The great efforts made of the Council and the organizers of the meetings to communicate with the international community has increased the interest in the Code in various circles. Their success in communicating the ideas of the Code to the United Nations team supervising the work of the Constitutional Committee and to the various participating delegations is an important achievement and a concrete step to activate its role.

 

The Code and its principles have become a reality that cannot be bypassed in the upcoming paths to the solution and the construction of a new Syria. Greetings and thanks should be given to all the participants, especially to its founding fathers.